 If maths is the truth and God is the truth then maths must explain the truth of God.

The only truth that mankind knows is the universal language of truth, mathematics.

1 + 1 = 2

A governing unchanging law from the beginning of time to the end of space.

This is an article that will explore an equation that tries shedding light to it all and beyond.

It's the theory of absolute infinity and all shown without surpassing any of our governing laws. The beauty of it is in its simplicity (This is not infinitesimal or infinities within our existing boundaries as I will show).

So starting with the basics and the limits of our mathematics, our governing laws.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9....

Our numerical system has potentially a never-ending amount of numbers. The more you count, the more we can plus another one.

Potentially an infinite amount, but in truth, only one number does exist

The number "1"

e.g. 1 + 1 + 1 = 3

That is because "1" explains itself and every other number. In fact, every number is a repetition (more precisely a reproduction) of the number "1". Not only does it explain every whole number but it also explains every type of number.

For example, a fraction or a decimal point is a part/portion of/within "1".

50% = 1/2 = 0.5 of 1

What's so special about "1" is it is also complete

1 = 100%

In maths, when something is complete It MUST have a bound and an end. In maths, this is signified with brackets ( )

( <---bound, beginning

) <---end, finish

***(We do not use the brackets because we consider it common knowledge.)

In maths we rarely use it but Brackets explain grouping pairs or completion in maths. That is why brackets are done first in any arithmetic equation

e.g (3+2) x (3+1) = 20

or

(5) x (4) = (20)

One is 100% completely bounded and ended to itself.

(1) or (100%)

Hence this instantly means "(1)", the number "1" is finite because of its restrictions.

ANYTHING that can be calculated is. Instantly our universe becomes finite (1) even if it has potentially infinite possibilities ().

1 = 100% = everything, hence the simple answer to a "Theory of everything" must be (1)

Our current understanding of the Infinite and all the different size infinities that we come to know are merely potential infinities of what number 1 can explain. It's just studying the infinite possibilities within (1). Even if there were multiverses, they would all still be encompassed by another greater (1)

Infinity =

Infinity is a concept and not a number. It is something boundless/endless and unrestricted (beyond the brackets)

If we accept this as a true statement ...

()

then it would literally be the greatest oxymoron to ever exist. How can the unrestricted concept be restricted?

To make matters worse there is also another restriction of the number (1). That is because by itself cannot do much. It needs a medium or a language to communicate. Multiple, divide, square root etc are all fancy and group methods of doing the core symbols of maths.

+ -

Just like (1),

(+|-) addition and subtraction can explain themselves and every other type of calculations.

Example

(1+1+1) + (1+1+1) = (1+1+1+1+1+1)

So inside every (1) we have (+|-).

E.g Man = (1) And has (+|-) within himself.

Think of anything Positive and negative, Addition subtraction, Time-space, Proton electron, Good Bad, Right Wrong, Light-Dark. We can even say Yin Yang for good measure

All we have is equal and opposites and one can not exist without the other. Black exists because of white and vice versa.

Think of anything, chemistry, biology, physics even non-scientific subjects.

Anything from a positive and a negative within a finite position can be explained quite easily.

(+ -) within (1)

Now to make it interesting..........

Scientifically we know we are living in 1 x (E=mc2), we are restricted. My question is say we calculated everything that exists in our (1) universe.

Hypothetically say everything = (100)

What would be

1 + (100) = ?

It can not be 101

Reason

Everything has already been calculated and it equalled (100)

Let me rephrase the question, from my brief explanation above what would be

1 + (finite) = ?

1 + (maths) = ?

1 + (1) = ?

1 + (universe) = ?

1 + (everything)= ?

1 + (100%) = ?

1 + (E=mc2) = ?

1 + (+|-) = ?

It must be something outside of the bound and end (brackets)

Our concept of this is called

Absolute = 100%

Infinity  = beyond any boundaries

To reiterate   is a concept and not a number so it must be beyond all bounds "(" and ends ")"

So in an equation

1 + (1) =

Or as explained before the core language of (1) is maths (+|-)

The theory of Absolute Infinity

1 + (+|-) =

Even though I have not surpassed our laws of mathematics, it displays something beyond mathematics.

AGREES WITH SCIENCE:

Quote: "If an object tries to travel 186,000 miles per second, its mass becomes infinite, and so does the energy required to move it. For this reason, no normal object can travel as fast or faster than the speed of light."

So if something exceeds this limit (1) its mass becomes infinite.

1 + (1) =

__________________

Mathematics studies the (+ | - ) laws to understand the (1) value.

Science studies the (1) value to understand the ( + | - ) laws.

__________________

Quantum Mechanics states for nothing to create something, laws must be in place for nothing to produce something.

The equation covers this aspect quite easily.

A law is something that governs its subjects. It is not an actual physical entity and can not be expressed as the value 1.

It is, however, an addition which must preexist our mathematical restrictions, as quantum mechanics states.

+ ( + | - ) This is the equation of Quantum mechanics,

And this (+|-) is what governing physics studies

__________________

RELIGION

It explains outside of our brackets

God is complete 1

100%

Yet he is incomprehensible

It explains that we have the option of either choosing a + path or - negative

If on the day of judgment "=" (The day of TOTALLING/Tallying/equal sign)

our good deeds outway our bad

1 + ( + > - ) = +

You will end up in eternal positive or heaven respectively

1 + ( + < -) = -

Hell

God 1 =

Created +

Everything (+ - )

and he only gives + "good" to all creation and everything (1) was made in pairs (+ - )

__________________

Prisca Theologia

+(+|-) Atheist, understand natural law exist and Quanta

() =  Pantheist, the universe is God

(1) =  Buddha said, look within yourself (1) and find your personal () nirvana.

( 1 + (+|-) = ) Christianity,

father 1=

holy spirit +

son (+|-)

Exterior brackets trinity

(holy spirit is the deliverer of the law, the son is earthly bound (+-) son)

Even though Jesus can have potentially an () possibilities within him, he can never be God. That is why he always said the father ∞ is greater than I (1)

Islam

Surah 112

Say he is one

1

on all whom depend

+

he begets not (+)

nor is begotten (-)

(+|-)

and none is like him

within the ayat, it mentions his name as l-Samadu meaning the Eternal the Absolute

It is everywhere (on every page in every Surah) in the Quran

Cantor actually coined the word "transfinite" in an attempt to distinguish the various levels of infinite numbers from an Absolute Infinity 100% , an incomprehensible concept beyond mathematics itself, which then Cantor effectively equated with God (he saw no contradiction between his mathematics and the traditional concept of God)

I'm merely saying the same thing. It doesn't matter if you call this concept Allah, God, Absolute Infinite. What's important to understand is that a concept beyond anything calculable (including all the potential infinities) does exist, as Cantor proclaimed.

IN RESPONSE TO Pi or other paradoxes

For all those who are going to give the response what about irrational numbers like Pi or other infinity paradoxes, well.....

This equation is explaining the Absolute Infinite beyond any restricting and governing laws.

Pi is restricted to and only potentially infinite.

To explain, Pi is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter and is restricted to the circle's circumference. It is within a 100% complete and enclosing "circle".

Same goes for every type and size of infinite we know.

For example, take the Hilbert hotel paradox, It is still within a hotel.

This infinite is bounded and ended by the governing laws of its confinements. When Time/Space ends, the numbers within it must end with it.

Absolute Infinity cannot be governed or restricted by numerical properties

Also 3.1415926535... is basically (1)+(1)+(1)

We have "3" individual 100% complete (1)s and we are 0.85840734641021... away from the next complete (1), or the 4th (1)

And for anyone who wants to argue for zero

Then I ask what is 0?

Cause if we mean something was there and then wasn't then it never can be 0 and if it never existed we wouldn't know the 0 of it exists

Something that exists cannot "not" exist because it has existed.

If the entity is removed it is the absence of existence, not uncreated.

Nothing can only exist because it was something.

Something can never become nothing because it was once something and nothing cannot be subtracted unless it becomes an additional something.

As soon as we label it nothing, it becomes something even if there is nothing there. The reason is when we identify its nothing, we give a no value (even if its nothing) within mathematical laws.

This doesn't only apply to physical or tangible entities.

For example, we can create (or add on) using our imagination. The unique imaginative something that we created exists at a certain time within your space so even if forgotten and never remembered again, it can never become nothing, only the addition it supplied is removed.

However, even this imaginative something is still restricted and can only be created because of our experiences.

We can not imagine what someone else imagines nor can we conjure up something unimaginable because everything you imagine is subject to your experiences or, your moment in time within the space of your life.

E.g Say I dreamt of a monster in my childhood.

Did that monster ever exist?

Actually yes, even though I just imagined it subconsciously it existed and was definable at that present time, even if none of the details can be remembered or is totally forgotten.

I.e it must be recorded for that particular time of my space

More so, for me just to give the above example I am creating something.

I've defined a nonexistent for example purposes so even if I never had any dreams of a monster in my life, it still exists because of my example.

Hence we can never identify "Absolute Zero" for as soon as we label "it", "it" becomes the absence of something rather than becoming from nothing.

Thanks for listening

bless you all 